“For the first time in my career, my students' progress is measured fairly, and I am paid when they actually learn. It changed how I plan every week.”
The numbers funders ask for — backed by published RCTs.
Every figure on this page is drawn from peer-reviewed research or rigorously documented programme data. No marketing maths.
How we know what we know.
Every programme is evaluated with the same standard: causal evidence, independently collected, pre-registered, openly published.
Randomised controlled trials
Schools are randomly assigned to treatment or control groups; allocations are blinded to assessors.
Pre-registration
Hypotheses, sample sizes, and analysis plans lodged with the AEA RCT Registry before data collection.
Independent assessors
Learning outcomes measured by trained enumerators with no programme affiliation.
Open data
Replication packages published with each peer-reviewed paper. Anonymised microdata available on request.
Peer-reviewed research & replication packages.
In the words of teachers and parents.
Quantitative results are only half the story. These accounts are drawn from independent interviews conducted by an external evaluation team.
“My daughter could not read in Standard 2. Now in Standard 4 she reads the newspaper to me. The teacher told me she practises with the school's SOMA coach every week.”
“The recognition was meaningful — but the alumni network is what changed my school. I have peers I can call when I am stuck.”
Photo gallery
A selection of editorial photography from KiuFunza, SOMA, and Mwalimu Kinara field sites. Real classrooms, real teachers, real students.
Among the most cost-effective learning interventions globally.
Approximate annual cost per child to produce equivalent learning gains, drawn from peer-reviewed comparisons in low- and middle-income settings.
Want the underlying data?
Replication packages are available on request. Write to our research team with your institutional affiliation.
Request data access